<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Active Xtream Technology &#187; Hardwares &amp; Parts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.activextream.com.my/category/hardwares-parts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.activextream.com.my</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:12:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Asus EAH5970 2GB GDDR5 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/03/27/asus-eah5970-2gb-gddr5-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/03/27/asus-eah5970-2gb-gddr5-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Display Card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardwares & Parts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.activextream.com.my/?p=1820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction


Today marks a 'red'-letter day of sorts for AMD, which looks to reclaim performance leadership in the graphics cards industry with its new flagship ATI Radeon HD 5970 graphics accelerator. Of all the products AMD has been working on over the past year, we bet this product won the most anticipation, since the "next big [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><h1>Introduction</h1>
<img src="http://tpucdn.com/reviews/ASUS/EAH5970/images/logo.jpg" border="0" alt="logo Asus EAH5970 2GB GDDR5 Review"  title="Asus EAH5970 2GB GDDR5 Review" />

Today marks a 'red'-letter day of sorts for AMD, which looks to reclaim performance leadership in the graphics cards industry with its new flagship ATI Radeon HD 5970 graphics accelerator. Of all the products AMD has been working on over the past year, we bet this product won the most anticipation, since the "next big thing" from a company in the hardware industry often defines its market position, and competitiveness as a solution provider. The Radeon HD 5970 makes use of two AMD Cypress GPUs in an internal multi-GPU configuration. The accelerator is compliant with Microsoft DirectX 11, which forms one of the important features of the company's Windows 7 operating system, and is a next-generation multimedia API. AMD Cypress on the other hand, with the recently launched Radeon HD 5800 series products, has established itself as the industry's single most powerful graphics processor.

For computer enthusiasts, replenished competition from either sides is always a win. Professional overclockers looking forward to the next big contest will naturally eye an accelerator that makes use of two of the most powerful GPUs on the planet. For the long-sighted buyer who is willing to splurge, this is potentially a one-time investment that secures future-proofing for long.

The Radeon HD 5970 packs two AMD Cypress GPUs with 1600 stream processors each (total 3200), and holds 1 GB of GDDR5 memory across a 256-bit wide memory interface per GPU (total 2 GB of memory on board, across a 2x 256-bit wide memory interface).

In this review, we will evaluate the performance, thermal, electrical, and acoustic characteristics of the ASUS EAH5970 Radeon HD 5970 graphics accelerator.
<table class="resulttable" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th></th>
<td>GeForce
GTX 280</td>
<td>Radeon
HD 4870 X2</td>
<td>GeForce
GTX 285</td>
<td>Radeon
HD 5850</td>
<td><strong>Radeon
HD 5870</strong></td>
<td>GeForce
GTX 295</td>
<td><strong>Radeon
HD 5970</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Shader units</th>
<td align="right">240</td>
<td align="right">2x 800</td>
<td align="right">240</td>
<td align="right">1440</td>
<td align="right"><strong>1600</strong></td>
<td align="right">2x 240</td>
<td align="right"><strong>2x 1600</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>ROPs</th>
<td align="right">32</td>
<td align="right">2x 16</td>
<td align="right">32</td>
<td align="right">32</td>
<td align="right"><strong>32</strong></td>
<td align="right">2x 28</td>
<td align="right"><strong>2x 32</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>GPU</th>
<td align="right">GT200</td>
<td align="right">2x RV770</td>
<td align="right">GT200b</td>
<td align="right">Cypress</td>
<td align="right"><strong>Cypress</strong></td>
<td align="right">2x GT200b</td>
<td align="right"><strong>2x Cypress</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Transistors</th>
<td align="right">1400M</td>
<td align="right">2x 956M</td>
<td align="right">1400M</td>
<td align="right">2154M</td>
<td align="right"><strong>2154M</strong></td>
<td align="right">2x 1400M</td>
<td align="right"><strong>2x 2154M</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Memory Size</th>
<td align="right">1024 MB</td>
<td align="right">2x 1024 MB</td>
<td align="right">1024 MB</td>
<td align="right">1024 MB</td>
<td align="right"><strong>1024 MB</strong></td>
<td align="right">2x 896 MB</td>
<td align="right"><strong>2x 1024 MB</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Memory Bus Width</th>
<td align="right">512 bit</td>
<td align="right">2x 256 bit</td>
<td align="right">512 bit</td>
<td align="right">256 bit</td>
<td align="right"><strong>256 bit </strong></td>
<td align="right">2x 448 bit</td>
<td align="right"><strong>2x 256 bit </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Core Clock</th>
<td align="right">602 MHz</td>
<td align="right">750 MHz</td>
<td align="right">648 MHz</td>
<td align="right">725 MHz</td>
<td align="right"><strong>850 MHz </strong></td>
<td align="right">576 MHz</td>
<td align="right"><strong>725 MHz </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Memory Clock</th>
<td align="right">1107 MHz</td>
<td align="right">900 MHz</td>
<td align="right">1242 MHz</td>
<td align="right">1000 MHz</td>
<td align="right"><strong>1200 MHz </strong></td>
<td align="right">999 MHz</td>
<td align="right"><strong>1000 MHz </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Price</th>
<td align="right">$329</td>
<td align="right">$429</td>
<td align="right">$340</td>
<td align="right">$299</td>
<td align="right"><strong>$399</strong></td>
<td align="right">$500</td>
<td align="right"><strong>$599</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
<h1>Packaging</h1>
<a href="http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/EAH5970/images/package1.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://tpucdn.com/reviews/ASUS/EAH5970/images/package1_small.jpg" border="0" alt="package1 small Asus EAH5970 2GB GDDR5 Review"  title="Asus EAH5970 2GB GDDR5 Review" /></a> <a href="http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/EAH5970/images/package2.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://tpucdn.com/reviews/ASUS/EAH5970/images/package2_small.jpg" border="0" alt="package2 small Asus EAH5970 2GB GDDR5 Review"  title="Asus EAH5970 2GB GDDR5 Review" /></a>

ASUS ships their EAH5970 in a big and colorful package that communicates all important product highlights on the front, the back has more detail in multiple languages.

<a href="http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/EAH5970/images/contents.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://tpucdn.com/reviews/ASUS/EAH5970/images/contents_small.jpg" border="0" alt="contents small Asus EAH5970 2GB GDDR5 Review"  title="Asus EAH5970 2GB GDDR5 Review" /></a>

You will receive:
<ul>
	<li>Graphics Card</li>
	<li>CrossFire Bridge</li>
	<li>Dirt 2 Coupon (Steam required)</li>
	<li>PCI-Express power adapter</li>
	<li>Mini-DisplayPort to DisplayPort adapter</li>
	<li>Documentation + Driver CDs</li>
	<li>DVI to HDMI Adapter</li>
	<li>Leather CD case</li>
</ul>
<h1>Architecture</h1>
AMD's dual-GPU graphics cards in recent times have carried a simple design methodology: There are two graphics processors, each with its own memory and voltage regulation circuitry. One of the two ...</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/03/27/asus-eah5970-2gb-gddr5-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thermaltake Toughpower 750w Review</title>
		<link>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/02/24/thermaltake-toughpower-750w-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/02/24/thermaltake-toughpower-750w-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardwares & Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.activextream.com.my/?p=1790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past few years the requirement for high-quality power supplies has become a real issue. Since processors and graphics cards have really started to suck down power, there has been a greater demand for power supplies to perform. Computers are generating a lot more heat these days, and this has got a lot to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few years the requirement for high-quality power supplies has become a real issue. Since processors and graphics cards have really started to suck down power, there has been a greater demand for power supplies to perform. Computers are generating a lot more heat these days, and this has got a lot to do with its components' high energy requirements. The latest and greatest desktop computers have indeed enormous power requirements reaching a point where anything under 400watts could be considered obsolete.

<img title="Thermaltake Toughpower 750w" src="http://www.activextream.com.my/images/thermaltake_toughpower_750w_01.jpg" alt="thermaltake toughpower 750w 01 Thermaltake Toughpower 750w Review" width="570" height="316" />

While basic office type computers can get away with crummy generic 350w power supplies, more powerful gaming systems certainly cannot. Doing so would result in serious system instability issues that can even place components such as the motherboard at great risk. High performance power supplies maintain a constant flow of power, and at the same time continue to deliver enough power.

Thermaltake offers a huge range of quality power supplies, designed for a wide range of different purposes. For example the Toughpower series consists of seven high powered units, all designed to deliver maximum performance. There is also the PurePower 350w power supply which features a completely passive design, meaning it is totally silent. The bulk of their power supplies form the PurePower series, in all there are ten power supplies ranging from 430w through to 680w. Today we will be reviewing a product coming from the Toughpower range, and is one of the bigger wattage items, outputting an impressive 750w.

Thermaltake claims that the working efficiency of the Toughpower 750w can reach up to 85%, thanks to a new design that makes use of top grade components. As was to be expected the 750w does carry a price premium simply because such highly rated units are hard to come by. We still consider the Toughpower 750w is priced reasonably for an unit of its output and quality. There is also available a similarly designed unit rated for 600w output, also part of the ToughPower family, this unit is considerably more affordable.

Despite being rated for such an extreme output, Thermaltake claims a very quiet operating volume for the 750w unit thanks to the use of a single 140mm fan. The unit features a single 20/24-pin power connector, one 4/8-pin power connector, dual PCI Express connectors, six 4-pin connectors, two 4-pin floppy connectors and six Serial ATA connectors. Furthermore, the unit features independent voltage circuit, over current, over voltage, short-circuit protection and Active PFC.

<strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Installation &amp; Testing</span></strong>

The power supply is probably one of the hardware components you can most easily install into a computer and the Toughpower 750w is no exception. Perhaps the most time-consuming part of a power supply installation is unplugging and removing the old one. The only important thing to remember is that the power supply should not be active or plugged to the wall while disconnecting all the cables inside your case. Assuming you do not need to remove an old power supply, the Toughpower 750w can ...</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/02/24/thermaltake-toughpower-750w-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cooler Master Elite 342 Casing</title>
		<link>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/02/24/cooler-master-elite-342-casing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/02/24/cooler-master-elite-342-casing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Casing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardwares & Parts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.activextream.com.my/?p=1781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction


Elite 342 (RC-342) is a mini-tower that accommodates micro-ATX, built with a modern black design body and front panel.  This chassis maintains Elite’s pedigree of compact-sized and quality build that would look great in any space. Elite 342 maintains a quiet environment while providing the option of adding 80mm or 90mm rear fans to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Introduction</span></strong>

<img class="alignright" title="Cooler Master Elite 342" src="http://www.activextream.com.my/images/cooler_master_elite_342_casing_showcase.jpg" alt="cooler master elite 342 casing showcase Cooler Master Elite 342 Casing" width="194" height="215" />
Elite 342 (RC-342) is a mini-tower that accommodates micro-ATX, built with a modern black design body and front panel.  This chassis maintains Elite’s pedigree of compact-sized and quality build that would look great in any space. Elite 342 maintains a quiet environment while providing the option of adding 80mm or 90mm rear fans to provide the best ventilation possible for a compact system.

<strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Features</span></strong>
<ul>
	<li>Front mesh design provides superior ventilation to maintain constant cooling</li>
	<li>Front I/O panel provides easy access for users</li>
	<li>Side panel security lock hole for higher security</li>
	<li>Side ventilation holes for better cooling performance</li>
	<li>Front 120 mm fan provides the best cooling solution</li>
	<li>Removable HDD cage</li>
</ul>
<strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Specifications</span></strong>

<strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><img class="aligncenter" title="Cooler Master Elite 342" src="http://www.activextream.com.my/images/cooler_master_elite_342_casing_specifications.jpg" alt="cooler master elite 342 casing specifications Cooler Master Elite 342 Casing" width="506" height="829" />
</span></span></strong></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/02/24/cooler-master-elite-342-casing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung SyncMaster P2370 Slim LCD</title>
		<link>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/01/26/samsung-syncmaster-p2370-slim-lcd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/01/26/samsung-syncmaster-p2370-slim-lcd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardwares & Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peripherals]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.activextream.com.my/?p=1744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Not everyone needs an LCD monitor is that is chocked full of additional features. You may not need to have a set of integrated speakers. Maybe you don’t want to have a USB hub or a wide range of input/output options. You just want something that looks slick and does its job well. If that’s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.activextream.com.my/images/samsung-syncmaster-p2370-01.jpg" alt="Samsung SyncMaster P2370 Slim LCD" title="Samsung SyncMaster P2370 Slim LCD" />

Not everyone needs an LCD monitor is that is chocked full of additional features. You may not need to have a set of integrated speakers. Maybe you don’t want to have a USB hub or a wide range of input/output options. You just want something that looks slick and does its job well. If that’s the case, then the Samsung P2370 just might be the ticket.

This is quite possibly the slimmest LCD as part of Samsung’s lineup, if not among the slimmest LCDs on the market today. The SyncMaster P2370 is a 23-inch widescreen monitor and the display portion measures just 30mm in thickness. That’s pretty darn thin.

<strong>Features and Specs</strong>

In line with the current trend toward multimedia-minded products, the Samsung P2370 features a 16:9 aspect ratio (like an HDTV) rather than the 16:10 widescreen aspect ratio that we’ve come to expect from computer monitors. Going through the rest of the feature list, we discover the following:

* Screen Size: 23-inch wide (16:9)
* Resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels
* Brightness: 250 cd/m²
* Contrast Ratio: DC 50000:1 (1000:1 Typ)
* Viewing Angle(Horizontal/Vertical): 170° / 160° (CR&gt;10)
* Dimensions (with Stand): 571.0 x 423.0 x 190.0 mm
* Special Features: MagicBright3, Off timer, Image Size Colour Effect, Customised key, MagicWizard &amp; MagicTune with AssetManagement, Windows Vista Premium, Safe Mode (DownScaling in UXGA)

<img src="http://www.activextream.com.my/images/samsung-syncmaster-p2370-02.jpg" alt="Samsung SyncMaster P2370 Slim LCD" title="Samsung SyncMaster P2370 Slim LCD" />

Inside the brown cardboard box, you’ll find the P2370 itself, as well as the glossy piano black stand, DVI cable, VGA-to-DVI cable, power supply and cable, a cleaning cloth, and instruction manual. This is all pretty standard fare, for the most part, though it is interesting that this monitor has an external power supply rather than one that is built into the unit itself. This aids in maintaining its slim and lightweight nature, I suppose, but it means that you’ll have another power brick on your desk or on the floor.

When you take the rote of producing one of the thinnest LCDs on the market, you have to expect that certain sacrifices will have to be made. As I mentioned earlier, the Samsung P2370 doesn’t have the same bells and whistles that you may expect from other monitors. There are no built-in speakers, USB hubs, or any of that jazz. You get a thin monitor and that’s about it.

<img src="http://www.activextream.com.my/images/samsung-syncmaster-p2370-03.jpg" alt="Samsung SyncMaster P2370 Slim LCD" title="Samsung SyncMaster P2370 Slim LCD" />

The slim pickings, so to speak, extend to the back of the monitor as well. You’ll notice that Samsung has decided on DVI as the only input method. You probably won’t be using a VGA connection, but it would have been nice to see HDMI support perhaps. This is meant to be a 16:9 multimedia monitor, after all.

You see, the goal is that the P2370 can take up as little space as possible, fitting on the smallest of desks without taking up too much room. That’s priority number one for this product. At least you get a true HD picture.

<strong>Say Hello to Starlight Touch</strong>

One thing that you have ...</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/01/26/samsung-syncmaster-p2370-slim-lcd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cooler Master Centurion 5 II Casing</title>
		<link>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/01/18/cooler-master-centurion-5-ii-casing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/01/18/cooler-master-centurion-5-ii-casing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Casing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardwares & Parts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://activextream.com.my/?p=1719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction

The all new Centurion 5 II has been vastly improved from the inside. This mid-tower chassis is designed with increased drive bay capacity, more airflow thanks to the enhanced ventilation and fan options and easy-to-install features. This is a multi-purpose chassis that you cannot go wrong with.

Features

	Supports up to five fans and provide extreme airflow [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 16px; vertical-align: top; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Introduction</span></strong></span>

<span style="font-family: Arial;">The all new Centurion 5 II has been vastly improved from the inside. This mid-tower chassis is designed with increased drive bay capacity, more airflow thanks to the enhanced ventilation and fan options and easy-to-install features. This is a multi-purpose chassis that you cannot go wrong with.</span>

<span style="font-family: Arial;"><span><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif;"><span style="font-size: 16px; vertical-align: top; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Features</span></strong></span></span></span></span>
<ul>
	<li><span style="font-family: Arial;">Supports up to five fans and provide extreme airflow with substantial performance</span></li>
	<li><span style="font-family: Arial;">Removable I/O module for flexible adjustment to your PC placement</span></li>
	<li><span style="font-family: Arial;">Adapter for 2.5” / 1.8” HDD</span></li>
	<li><span style="font-family: Arial;">Front 140 mm Blue LED on/off fan provides excellent cooling to HDDs</span></li>
	<li><span style="font-family: Arial;">CPU retaining hole for easy CPU cooler installation</span></li>
	<li><span style="font-family: Arial;">Cable management for quick cable routing and neatness</span></li>
	<li><span style="font-family: Arial;">PSU bottom fan can be setup facing upwards / downwards (filter included)</span></li>
</ul>
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1720" title="coolermaster-centurion5-II-features" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/coolermaster-centurion5-II-features.jpg" alt="coolermaster centurion5 II features Cooler Master Centurion 5 II Casing" width="560" height="1250" />

<span style="font-size: 16px; vertical-align: top; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Specifications</span></strong></span>

<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: medium;"><span><strong><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1721" title="coolermaster-centurion5-II-specifications" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/coolermaster-centurion5-II-specifications.png" alt="coolermaster centurion5 II specifications Cooler Master Centurion 5 II Casing" width="578" height="496" /></span></span></strong></span></span>

<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: medium;"><span><strong><span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif;"><span style="font-weight: normal;">
</span></span></strong></span></span></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/01/18/cooler-master-centurion-5-ii-casing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DFI P55 MI-T36, A Little Cutie</title>
		<link>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/01/18/dfi-p55-mit36-cutie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/01/18/dfi-p55-mit36-cutie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardwares & Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherboards]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://activextream.com.my/?p=1713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DFI unveiled the P55 MI-T36 to the public a couple of months ago. It's an exciting little board based upon the P55 chipset, cut back to the most desirable essentials in order to facilitate a shrink down to the mini-ITX form factor. It also offers plenty of overclocking features within the current BIOS.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DFI unveiled the P55 MI-T36 to the public a couple of months ago. It's an exciting little board based upon the P55 chipset, cut back to the most desirable essentials in order to facilitate a shrink down to the mini-ITX form factor. It also offers plenty of overclocking features within the current BIOS.

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1716" title="DFI-P55-MI-T36-large" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/DFI-P55-MI-T36-large.jpg" alt="DFI P55 MI T36 large DFI P55 MI T36, A Little Cutie" width="550" height="413" /></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.activextream.com.my/2010/01/18/dfi-p55-mit36-cutie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD’s Radeon HD 5850 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.activextream.com.my/2009/10/04/amds-radeon-hd-5850-shoe-drops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.activextream.com.my/2009/10/04/amds-radeon-hd-5850-shoe-drops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 14:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Display Card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardwares & Parts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD’s Radeon HD 5850]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://activextream.com.my/?p=1705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the other shoe drops, with AMD launching the 5870’s companion card: the slightly pared down 5850. It’s the same Cypress core that we saw on the 5870 with the same features: DX11, Eyefinity, angle-independent anisotropic filtering, HDMI bitstreaming, and supersample anti-aliasing. The only difference between the two is performance and power – the 5850 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today the other shoe drops, with AMD launching the 5870’s companion card: the slightly pared down 5850. It’s the same Cypress core that we saw on the 5870 with the same features: DX11, Eyefinity, angle-independent anisotropic filtering, HDMI bitstreaming, and supersample anti-aliasing. The only difference between the two is performance and power – the 5850 is a bit slower, and a bit less power hungry. If by any chance you’ve missed our Radeon HD 5870 review, please check it out; it goes in to full detail on what AMD is bringing to the table with Cypress and the HD 5800 series.
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" width="550" align="center" bordercolor="#dddddd">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="115" align="center" bgcolor="#016a96"></td>
<td width="96" align="center" bgcolor="#016a96">ATI Radeon HD 5870</td>
<td width="97" align="center" bgcolor="#016a96">ATI Radeon HD 5850</td>
<td width="100" align="center" bgcolor="#016a96">ATI Radeon HD             4890</td>
<td width="100" align="center" bgcolor="#016a96">ATI Radeon HD             4870</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee">Stream Processors</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">1600</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">1440</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">800</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">800</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee">Texture Units</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">80</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">72</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">40</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee">ROPs</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">32</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">32</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">16</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee">Core Clock</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">850MHz</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">725MHz</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">850MHz</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">750MHz</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee">Memory Clock</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">1.2GHz (4.8GHz data rate) GDDR5</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">1GHz (4GHz data rate) GDDR5</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">975MHz (3900MHz data rate) GDDR5</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">900MHz (3600MHz data rate) GDDR5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee">Memory Bus Width</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">256-bit</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">256-bit</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">256-bit</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">256-bit</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee">Frame Buffer</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">1GB</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">1GB</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">1GB</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">1GB</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee">Transistor Count</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">2.15B</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">2.15B</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">959M</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">956M</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee">TDP</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">188W</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">151W</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">190W</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">150W</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee">Manufacturing Process</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">TSMC 40nm</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">TSMC 40nm</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">TSMC 55nm</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">TSMC 55nm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee">Price Point</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">$379</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">$259</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">~$180</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">~$160</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
AMD updated the specs on the 5850 at the last moment when it comes to power. Idle power usage hasn’t changed, but the final parts are now specified for 151W load power, versus the 160W originally given to us, and 188W on the 5870. So for the power-conscious out there, the 5850 offers a load power reduction in lockstep with its performance reduction.
<p align="center"><img src="http://images.anandtech.com/reviews/video/ATI/5850/Cards.jpg" alt="Cards AMD’s Radeon HD 5850 Review"  title="AMD’s Radeon HD 5850 Review" /></p>

As compared to the 5870, AMD has disabled two of the SIMDs and reduced the core clock from 850MHz to 725Mhz. This is roughly a 15% drop in clock speed and a 10% reduction in SIMD capacity, for a combined theoretical performance difference of 23%. Meanwhile the memory clock has been dropped from 1.2GHz to 1GHz, for a 17% overall reduction. Notably the ROP count has not been reduced, so the 5850 doesn’t lose as much rasterizing power as it does everything else, once again being 15% due to the drop in clock speed.

With the reduction in power usage, AMD was able to squeeze Cypress in to a slightly smaller package for the 5850. The 5850 lobs off an inch in length compared to the 5870, which will make it easier to fit in to cramped cases. ...</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.activextream.com.my/2009/10/04/amds-radeon-hd-5850-shoe-drops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD&#8217;s DX11 GPU, Eyefinity and 6 Display Outputs</title>
		<link>http://www.activextream.com.my/2009/09/11/amds-dx11-gpu-eyefinity-6-display-outputs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.activextream.com.my/2009/09/11/amds-dx11-gpu-eyefinity-6-display-outputs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Display Card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dx11 gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eyefinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holodeck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://activextream.com.my/?p=1676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


Introduction
That's six Dell 30" displays, each with an individual resolution of 2560 x 1600. The game is World of Warcraft and the man crouched in front of the setup is Carrell Killebrew, his name may sound familiar.

Driving all of this is AMD's next-generation GPU, which will be announced later this month. I didn't leave out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1677" title="eyefinity2" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/eyefinity2.jpg" alt="eyefinity2 AMDs DX11 GPU, Eyefinity and 6 Display Outputs" width="550" height="308" />

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1678" title="eyefinity" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/eyefinity.jpg" alt="eyefinity AMDs DX11 GPU, Eyefinity and 6 Display Outputs" width="550" height="408" />
<h3><span style="color: #ff6600;">Introduction</span></h3>
That's six Dell 30" displays, each with an individual resolution of 2560 x 1600. The game is World of Warcraft and the man crouched in front of the setup is Carrell Killebrew, his name <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3469">may sound familiar</a>.

Driving all of this is AMD's next-generation GPU, which will be announced later this month. I didn't leave out any letters, there's a single GPU driving all of these panels. The actual resolution being rendered at is 7680 x 3200; WoW got over 80 fps with the details maxed. This is the successor to the RV770. We can't talk specs but at today's AMD press conference two details are public: 2.15 billion transistors and over 2.5 TFLOPs of performance. As expected, but nice to know regardless.

The technology being demonstrated here is called Eyefinity and it actually all started in notebooks.
<h3><span style="color: #ff6600;">Not Multi-Monitor, but Single Large Surface</span></h3>
DisplayPort is gaining popularity. It's a very simple interface and you can expect to see mini-DisplayPort on notebooks and desktops alike in the very near future. Apple was the first to embrace it but others will follow.

The OEMs asked AMD for six possible outputs for DisplayPort from their notebook GPUs: up to two internally for notebook panels, up to two externally for conncetors on the side of the notebook and up to two for use via a docking station. In order to fulfill these needs AMD had to build in 6 lanes of DisplayPort outputs into its GPUs, driven by a single display engine. A single display engine could drive any two outputs, similar to how graphics cards work today.

Eventually someone looked at all of the outputs and realized that without too much effort you could drive six displays off of a single card - you just needed more display engines on the chip. AMD's DX11 GPU family does just that.

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1679" title="eyefinitylogo" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/eyefinitylogo.jpg" alt="eyefinitylogo AMDs DX11 GPU, Eyefinity and 6 Display Outputs" width="550" height="431" />

At the bare minimum, the lowest end AMD DX11 GPU can support up to 3 displays. At the high end? A single GPU will be able to drive up to 6 displays.

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1680" title="configuration" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/configuration.jpg" alt="configuration AMDs DX11 GPU, Eyefinity and 6 Display Outputs" width="550" height="496" />

AMD's software makes the displays appear as one.  This will work in Vista, Windows 7 as well as Linux.

The software layer makes it all seamless. The displays appear independent until you turn on SLS mode (Single Large Surface). When on, they'll appear to Windows and its applications as one large, high resolution display. There's no multimonitor mess to deal with, it just works. This is <em>the</em> way to do multi-monitor, both for work and games.

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1681" title="displayproperties" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/displayproperties.jpg" alt="displayproperties AMDs DX11 GPU, Eyefinity and 6 Display Outputs" width="550" height="418" />

Note the desktop resolution of the 3x2 display setup

I played Dirt 2, a DX11 title at 7680 x 3200 and saw definitely playable frame rates. I played Left 4 Dead and the experience was much better. Obviously this new GPU is powerful, although I ...</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.activextream.com.my/2009/09/11/amds-dx11-gpu-eyefinity-6-display-outputs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kingston HyperX KHX1600C8D3K2/4GX 2&#215;2GB Review</title>
		<link>http://www.activextream.com.my/2009/09/11/kingston-hyperx-khx1600c8d3k24gx-2x2gb-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.activextream.com.my/2009/09/11/kingston-hyperx-khx1600c8d3k24gx-2x2gb-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[RAM Module]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hyperx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kingston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://activextream.com.my/?p=1650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Introduction
Intel's Nehalem cores launched last year to much fanfare and striking levels of performance over past generation processors. One new feature was the use of a tri-channel memory configuration that offered huge memory bandwidth and excellent memory performance. Now that the latest iteration of the Nehalam architecture has been released to the masses, the fact [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><h3><span style="color: #ff6600;">Introduction</span></h3>
Intel's Nehalem cores launched last year to much fanfare and striking levels of performance over past generation processors. One new feature was the use of a tri-channel memory configuration that offered huge memory bandwidth and excellent memory performance. Now that the latest iteration of the Nehalam architecture has been released to the masses, the fact is that this new generation is meant for the mainstream users and not simply the uber elite, high end user. To keep the costs in line with the mainstream mantra, Intel chose to go back to a dual-channel memory configuration. This, of course, presents the opportunity to bring out new sets of memory designed to work with the Intel Corei5/i7 Lynnfied processors and P55 chipset motherboards
<div id="preLoadLayer0" style="position: absolute; z-index: 4000; top: -32px; left: -18px; display: none;"><img style="border: 0px none ;" src="http://kona.kontera.com/javascript/lib/imgs/grey_loader.gif" alt="grey loader Kingston HyperX KHX1600C8D3K2/4GX 2x2GB Review"  title="Kingston HyperX KHX1600C8D3K2/4GX 2x2GB Review" /></div>
. If the performance delivered by the last set of Kingston HyperX modules is indicative of what I can expect from this set of modules, then I can't wait to get to testing them out to see just where they perform.

This set of Kingston HyperX modules includes two 2GB modules rated to run at latencies of 8-8-8-24 at 1600MHz, using no more than the Intel specified 1.65 volts. Why only 1.65v? So you do not cause irreparable harm to your new Core i5 baby as it is based on the same architecture as the 9 series Core i7 processors. If you have been around long enough to remember the early Athlon 64 chips suddenly dying because of running the vdimm brutally high while keeping the CPU core voltage low, Intel is giving guidance so that they do not have the same issue. Since the memory specification on the i5 caps out at 1333MHz, how do you run these modules at 1600MHz? Well, since we are an enthusiast community, you have to overclock the Corei5 processor to reach the 1600MHz mark; something that is easily achievable with a moderate clock increase. This set of modules does not carry the T1 heatspreader design, so will heat be an issue for this kit? Only one way to tell! Now let's look at the modules and see just what they are made of and if they deliver on the promise of performance.
<h3><span style="color: #ff6600;">Closer Look</span></h3>
The Kingston HyperX modules come in a retail blister pack. Information on the label includes the kit model number KHX1600C8D3K2/4GX, the size of the modules and the top level memory specifications on the bottom of the label. This label serves a dual purpose; to provide the consumer information about the memory, as well as serving as a security seal for the modules, proving they have not been tampered with. The rear of the package does not provide any information and merely shows the knockouts where the modules are locked in to prevent damage.

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1651" title="Kingston_HyperX_KHX1600C8D3K2_4GX_1" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Kingston_HyperX_KHX1600C8D3K2_4GX_1.jpg" alt="Kingston HyperX KHX1600C8D3K2 4GX 1 Kingston HyperX KHX1600C8D3K2/4GX 2x2GB Review" width="598" height="448" />

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1652" title="Kingston_HyperX_KHX1600C8D3K2_4GX_2" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Kingston_HyperX_KHX1600C8D3K2_4GX_2.jpg" alt="Kingston HyperX KHX1600C8D3K2 4GX 2 Kingston HyperX KHX1600C8D3K2/4GX 2x2GB Review" width="598" height="448" />

The HyperX KHX1600C8D3K2/4GX set of modules consists of a set ...</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.activextream.com.my/2009/09/11/kingston-hyperx-khx1600c8d3k24gx-2x2gb-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel Lynnfield Core i5 750 and Core i7 870 Processor Review</title>
		<link>http://www.activextream.com.my/2009/09/09/intel-lynnfield-core-i5-750-core-i7-870-processor-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.activextream.com.my/2009/09/09/intel-lynnfield-core-i5-750-core-i7-870-processor-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel core i5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel core i7 870]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel lynnfield]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[processor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://activextream.com.my/?p=1565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Introduction
Intel is on the verge of transitioning to 32nm. We'll see the first parts this year. What do you do with your 45nm fabs when you start moving volume away from them? Make really cheap quad-core Nehalems of course:



I'm talking $196. I'm talking faster than AMD's entire lineup. I'm talking about arguably the best processor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1567" title="Intel_Lynnfield_Core i5_and_Core i7" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Intel_Lynnfield_Core-i5_and_Core-i7.png" alt="Intel_Lynnfield_Core i5_and_Core i7" width="599" height="277" />
<h3><span style="color: #ff6600;">Introduction</span></h3>
Intel is on the verge of transitioning to 32nm. We'll see the first parts this year. What do you do with your 45nm fabs when you start moving volume away from them? Make really cheap quad-core Nehalems of course:

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1568" title="Intel_Lynnfield_Core i5_and_Core i7_1" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Intel_Lynnfield_Core-i5_and_Core-i7_1.jpg" alt="Intel_Lynnfield_Core i5_and_Core i7_1" width="550" height="558" />

I'm talking $196. I'm talking faster than AMD's entire lineup. I'm talking about arguably the best processor of 2009. I'm talking about Lynnfield, and here's its backside:

<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-1569" title="Intel_Lynnfield_Core i5_and_Core i7_2" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Intel_Lynnfield_Core-i5_and_Core-i7_2.jpg" alt="Intel_Lynnfield_Core i5_and_Core i7_2" width="550" height="558" />

I spent much of the past year harping on AMD selling Nehalem-sized Phenom IIs for less than Intel sold Nehalems. With Lynnfield, Intel actually made Nehalem even bigger all while driving prices down. Like I said, what do you do when you're still making boatloads of money in a recession and are about to start emptying your 45nm fabs?

I should clear things up before we progress much further. Lynnfield is the codename for mainstream 45nm quad-core Nehalem, while Bloomfield refers to the first Nehalem launched at the end of 2008:
<table style="height: 67px;" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" width="526" align="center" bordercolor="#dddddd">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#016a96"><strong><strong>Processor</strong></strong></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#016a96"><strong>Manufacturing Process</strong></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#016a96"><strong>Die Size</strong></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#016a96"><strong>Transistor Count</strong></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#016a96"><strong>Socket</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee"><strong>Bloomfield</strong></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">45nm</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">263 mm<sup>2</sup></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">731M</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">LGA-1366</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" bgcolor="#eeeeee"><strong>Lynnfield</strong></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">45nm</td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7"><strong>296 mm<sup>2</sup></strong></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7"><strong>774M</strong></td>
<td align="center" bgcolor="#f7f7f7">LGA-1156</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
Despite being cheaper, Lynnfield is larger than Bloomfield. The larger die is due to one major addition: an on-die PCIe controller.

<div id="attachment_1570" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 560px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1570" title="Intel_Lynnfield_Core i5_and_Core i7_3" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Intel_Lynnfield_Core-i5_and_Core-i7_3.jpg" alt="Bloomfield, The First Nehalem, circa 2008" width="550" height="358" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Bloomfield, The First Nehalem, circa 2008</p></div>

<div id="attachment_1571" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 560px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1571" title="Intel_Lynnfield_Core i5_and_Core i7_4" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Intel_Lynnfield_Core-i5_and_Core-i7_4.jpg" alt="Lynnfield, Nehalem for All, circa 2009" width="550" height="336" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Lynnfield, Nehalem for All, circa 2009</p></div>

The pink block to the right of the die is the PCIe controller, that's 16 PCIe 2.0 lanes coming right off the chip. Say hello to ultra low latency GPU communication. You'd think that Intel was about to enter the graphics market or something with a design like this.

Sacrifices were made to reduce CPU, socket and board complexity. Gone are the two QPI links that each provided 25.6GB/s of bandwidth to other CPUs or chips on the motherboard. We also lose one of the three 64-bit DDR3 memory channels, Lynnfield only has two like a <em>normal</em> processor (silly overachieving Bloomfield).

<div id="attachment_1573" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 520px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1573" title="Intel_Lynnfield_Core i5_and_Core i7_5" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Intel_Lynnfield_Core-i5_and_Core-i7_51.jpg" alt="Intel's Bloomfield Platform (X58 + LGA-1366)" width="510" height="452" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Intel&#39;s Bloomfield Platform (X58 + LGA-1366)</p></div>

The sum is that Lynnfield is exclusively single-socket; there will be no LGA-1156 Skulltrail. While the dual-channel memory controller isn't really a limitation for quad-core parts, six and eight core designs may be better suited for LGA-1366.

<div id="attachment_1574" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 560px"><img class="size-full wp-image-1574" title="Intel_Lynnfield_Core i5_and_Core i7_6" src="http://activextream.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Intel_Lynnfield_Core-i5_and_Core-i7_6.jpg" alt="Intel's Lynnfield Platform (P55 + LGA-1156)" width="550" height="448" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Intel&#39;s Lynnfield Platform (P55 + LGA-1156)</p></div>

The loss of QPI means that Lynnfield doesn't have a super fast ...</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.activextream.com.my/2009/09/09/intel-lynnfield-core-i5-750-core-i7-870-processor-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
